Skip to content
English - Australia
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Case studies and evidence from Australian models

What the Australian evidence shows, and what it means for your service.

What this is: a plain summary of what the Australian evidence shows about virtual care, with examples from real models.

Who it's for: service leaders, clinicians and anyone making the case for virtual care.

What the Australian evidence shows

The honest headline is that virtual care works best as a supplement to in-person care, not a replacement for it. Used well, it improves access, eases workforce pressure and can match the quality of in-person care. Used badly, or where the connection and the local team are not there to support it, it falls short. Patients often still prefer to be seen in person, and the evidence is clear that virtual care depends on connectivity and on planning the workforce around it. The examples below are real Australian models that show what good looks like.

A hybrid rural generalist model in western New South Wales

One of the strongest pieces of Australian evidence comes from a hybrid virtual rural generalist service in western New South Wales, evaluated and published in the Medical Journal of Australia in 2024. Rural generalist doctors cover a network of remote hospitals, roughly three-quarters virtually and one-quarter in person, stepping in when the local doctor needs relief or when there is no local doctor available.

The evaluation found the service delivered care of similar quality to traditional services for comparable presentations, at lower cost, while easing the fatigue and workload on local clinicians. The lesson is that a well-designed hybrid model can hold quality steady and help keep a rural workforce in place, rather than trading one off against the other.

Community-controlled chronic disease care in Queensland

A community-controlled health service in Queensland co-designed a virtual chronic disease program with its community. Aboriginal Health Workers were trained as health coaches and became the trusted link between the patient and the visiting or remote clinician.

The lesson here is about who delivers the care. The model worked because it was designed with the community, not for it, and because it put Aboriginal Health Workers at the centre as skilled members of the team. Take the cultural safety and community ownership out of this model and it would not work. Leave them in, and virtual care becomes something the community uses and trusts.

Diabetes and cardiovascular care across the Northern Territory

Across remote primary care services in the Northern Territory, virtual care has been used to support diabetes and cardiovascular care, with retinal imaging as a way to engage patients and pick up problems early. Bringing the specialist view to the community, rather than sending the patient on a long trip to the specialist, is the heart of it.

The lesson is that a practical, concrete service, built around a real clinical need and a tool that engages people, lands better than virtual care offered in the abstract. Start with a clear problem worth solving.

What this means for your service

A few patterns run through all of these. Design with the community, not for it. Plan the workforce and the connectivity before you start, because virtual care leans on both. Treat virtual care as a supplement that widens access, not a way to remove the local presence people value. And measure what you do, so you can show your own version of this evidence to your funder and your community. The article on demonstrating quality shows you how to capture it.

Need help?

Visionflex acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and pays respect to Elders past, present and emerging.